Failure
Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Failure
Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA) or to give it its correct title Failure Mode
Effects & Criticality Analysis (FMECA) is a logical technique used to identify
and eliminate possible causes of failure. The technique requires a sequential,
disciplined approach, to assess systems, products or processes in order to
establish the modes of failure and the effects of failure on the system, product
or process. This is to ensure that all possible failure modes have been fully
identified and ranked in order of their importance. The FMECA discipline
requires the documentation (see worksheet opposite) of any evaluation with
regard to the failure mode, effect and criticality. The analysis work can be
applied at any stage; design, manufacture, test, installation or use, but is
best performed at the early (development or design) stage. In a simple system
the study may be performed on the total system or product but with more complex
systems it may be necessary to break the product down into various sub-systems
or sub-assemblies.
The technique is often seen as part of an
organisation's; Lean,
Value Stream Analysis,
Root Cause Analysis programme.
Reasons for FMECA
With ever increasing demands to ensure that QUALITY is achieved RIGHT
FIRST TIME then still greater pressures are placed on the engineer or
process developer. This is to ensure that the process or design performs
consistently, reliably and safely throughout the life of the product or process,
thus providing a quality product or service that completely meets the demands of
the customer. Designers and developers are only human, they can make mistakes
and have off days just like everyone else. FMECA ensures that any inadequacies
in the product or service are quickly identified, preventing the possibility
of releasing sub-standard products or providing a sub-standard service.
Product testing will of course help identify any design deficiencies, there
are however, possible limitations with this approach:
| If the product fails the trial then the modified and hopefully improved
design will need to be retested - this can lead to inefficient use of
resource. |
| Process improvement |
| Tests and trials can usually only be performed on a limited number of
products, consequently all the possible variations in specification and build
standard cannot always be evaluated. Using small samples may also not be
sufficiently accurate to predict field failure rates, particularly when
attempting to identify causes of potentially low field failure rates (½ or
1%). These missed potential failures may result in the need for product recall
or the issuing of advisory notices, (particularly in the case of safety
critical failures). This can be not only expensive but also damaging for both
the company and product's credibility and reputation. |
| Regulatory Reasons |
| Continuous Improvement |
| Preventive (not corrective) approach |
| Team Building |
| Required by Procedures e.g. specifically dossier for submission when CE
marking |
Other reasons may include, meeting the requirements of:
| ISO TS 16949 - Quality management systems - Particular
requirements for the application of ISO 9001:2000 for automotive
production and relevant service part organisations |
| AS9100 - Quality Management System Requirements for
Design and/or Manufacture of Aerospace Products or AS9110 - Quality
Management System Requirements for Maintenance Organisations |
| BS EN 60812 Analysis techniques for system
reliability. Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)
|
| ISO 14971 The application of Risk Management to Medical
devices |
| BS EN 31010 The standard associated with Risk
Management techniques |
|
Stage |
Process Function |
Possible Failure Mode |
Effects of Failure on System |
Cause |
O |
S |
D |
R |
Action to
eliminate |
Receiving |
Initial check for identification, damage & paperwork.
Segregate & locate items from untested and test. |
Inadvertent use of untested items |
Loss traceability
Possible use of defective materials |
Human
error |
2 |
10 |
5 |
100 |
Separate incoming goods . |
Labelling |
Identify product with part number |
Operator error, documentation not clear, note
identifying area small |
Loss of traceability |
Human
Error |
2 |
10 |
5 |
100 |
Automatic label generator printing correct details |
Review Cert of Conformity |
Confirm product tested and within spec. |
Material has deteriorated. Wrong material sent |
|
Human
Error |
1 |
10 |
1 |
10 |
Product sent for analysis |
|
So FMECA provides the potential for:
| Reducing the likelihood of Customer Complaints |
| Reducing the likelihood of campaign changes |
| Reducing maintenance and warranty costs |
| Reducing the possibility of safety failures |
| Reducing the possibility of extended life or reliability failures |
| Reducing the likelihood of product liability claims |
Typical FMECA Process
For further information
If you would like to know more about
FMEA please contact
Sales at:
Telephone:
+44 -0 1483 453511Fax: +44 -0 1483 453512
Postal address:
Quality Management & Training Limited PO Box
172, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7FN United Kingdom Electronic mail:
Technical Support:
help@qmt.co.uk
General Information:
sales@qmt.co.uk
Customer Support:
tutor@qmt.co.uk
|